inflation

1. Inflation is something that makes no sense.
But it is very useful, especially when it turned out that inflation is not only the process that created our universe, but scientists figured out that there was another, special inflation, when there was absolutely no space, this inflation created the basis for the big bang.

2. The most incredible inflation (#1).
When there was not yet a universe, some quantum fumes were wandering, which despite the lack of sense created a space the size of a grapefruit, and this resulted in the fact that the accumulated energy there appeared to be a big bang.
And because gravity appeared, so the nascent universe was not torn apart.

3. This is how the universe came about and probably then inflation (#2) had to happen, which was a bit different. Just like?
It was invented that the mechanisms of this inflation are driving dark energy.
But because scientists can not figure out how it works, they invented repulsive gravity.
Here also is need a dark energy but at least it seems to us that we understand how gravity works.

4. The crazy moment in the development of the universe when the basic conditions that created and enable the existence of the universe, simply ceased to exist (disappear).
It is not a joke just a very serious scientific theory.

5. Gravity, which actually created the universe, is miraculously transformed into repulsive gravity that causes the explosive expansion of the universe.
When it seemed that the universe disappeared forever, deprived of gravity which is the essence of its existence, at the last moment this destructive gravity turns into normal gravity again.

6. Only the basic mechanism that creates the universe, even during inflation, is not some miraculous expansion of space, only the creation of a new space.
Just as possible that in the period of inflation, the space bounded by gravity replicated faster than the speed of light (i.e. the speed of gravity).

7. So what causes inflation to work? Nothing.
it is simply the greatest scientific idiocy of the 20th century.
But why, in spite of total idiocy, scientists are so fiercely fighting for the duration of this illusion.
Because if inflation were not invented, the possibilities of explaining how our universe originated from nothing would be dramatically reduced.
———–
Text is a little simplistic (1, 2) because my tragic English doesn’t allow too much.
But it will be clarified.
Because in fact it is more complicated, that is, some scientists say, there was a sort of space before the Big Bang, and this is a total madness.

Advertisements

without 2018 Big Bang

1. without any sense

(1/17) Almost our entire comprehension of the nature of the Universe manifested itself for us in a few glimpses of human genius: finite but without borders … independent of anything … expands from Nothing…ness!

So, can something ruin this beautiful picture of the universe? Maybe – but don’t try to guess.

(2/17) So how to understand this universe when we don’t have the slightest idea of what we want to understand … and this isn’t a problem of faith, only reason.

Paraphrasing the famous statements of quantum physics … most of our reasoning has a negligible effect on our concept of the essence of the universe.

(3/17) Big Bang – beginning of the existence of the Universe. But how could the universe come into existence when there was no space where the explosion could occur.

Simplifying: if the universe was created in the Big Bang, only what about the reason behind the very existence of the Universe in the first place?

(4/17) How did this scientific nonsense appear?

Maybe this way: The universe appeared miraculously by creating a space smaller than a grain of sand where something unimaginable and incomprehensible exploded. And since the explosion was controlled by gravity so it prevented the rupture of the universe.

Big Bang! The full triumph of the scientific mind. Not necessarily! Maybe scientific nonsense became so perfect that we don’t notice the idiocies which are embedded in this wisdom!

2. expansion of …

(5/17) The beginning was beautiful. A static universe. Eternal. But the existence of such a universe makes no sense from a scientific point of view, because gravity would destroy such a universe just as Big Crunch will one day destroy our universe.

(6/17) The universe was created as a result of Big Bang, expands and the expanding space carries the galaxies along with it. Total crap that repeats mediocre scientists. In fact, it is only the space itself that expands (growing by itself) between stationary (fixed) clausters of galaxies, which results in the expansion of the universe.

(7/17) But if it can make any sense at all, clusters of galaxies must rush to keep up with the expanding universe. Total contradiction. No, it’s just our mind. Because the problem does not concern the reality of the Universe, but how we perceive it.

(8/17) How to comprehend it all: while space itself is expanding (rather more accurately) is growing by itself between (but doesn’t affect) fixed superclusters of galaxies … which are moving away from each other, without any real cause or reason, remaining unmoved by the action of these forces.

(9/17) So … when in the early universe two galaxies were separated from each other at a distance of 1 billion light years, so now, after 12 billion years, these same two galaxies are separated (from each other) by a distance of about 86 billion light years … aren’t flying apart from each other.

3. Big Crunch.

(10/17) It might seem that we have been able to create a wonderful description of the universe. Only why so many simplifications, understatements and obsessions like Big Crunch. Because if our knowledge of gravity was the whole truth about the universe, then nothing would make sense.

And yet repulsive gravity still appears in scientific theories. Not only about inflation and even expansion of the universe.

(11/17) Only, from this incredible power of repulsive gravity that can push the supercluster of millions of galaxies together with the awesome power of their gravity.

Maybe to give some thought to terrible doubts of the repulsive gravity: which way to push the nearest superclusters of galaxie.  Towards us or in the opposite direction. But it is also possible that right now, this terrible power of repulsive gravity squeezes our entire supercluster of galaxies in a murderous grip.

So are we trying to understand why repulsive gravity makes no sense, (neither in inflation nor especially in the expansion of the universe)?

———–

I’m not a scientist. I’m not a student. Living on the edge of the universe in a small town (Wielun, Poland) I still had to run away from white bears so I couldn’t even finish primary school. So it’s not surprising that learning English for over 12 years without any effect.

 

without 2018

1. without any sense
———————————
(1/14)
Almost our entire comprehension of the nature of the Universe manifested itself for us in a few glimpses of human genius: finite but without borders … independent of anything … expands from Nothing…ness!
But if that’s all true, this is where the greatest mystery of the universe lies. So doesn’t even let us try to guess what it might be. Because this isn’t a problem of faith, only reason.
But paraphrasing the famous statements of quantum physics … most of our reasoning has a negligible effect on our concept of the essence of the universe.

(2/14)
The universe was created in a great explosion (BB). Only why there was no space before big bang (beginning of the existence of the Universe) … or maybe less fun.
How could the universe come into existence when there was no space where the
explosion (big bang) could take place?
Simplifying: if the universe was created in the Big Bang, only what about the reason behind the very existence of the Universe in the first place?

(3/14)
Of course, it can also be said that the universe appeared in a wonderful way, creating a space the size of a grain of sand where something unimaginable and incomprehensible occurred or exploded.
And since the explosion was controlled by gravity so it prevented the rupture of the universe. But still without any sense.

(4/14)
Whereas entire our scientific achievements are describing the development of the universe that was created and formed as a result of a great explosion (BB).
Everything sensible, logical, probable.
The full triumph of the scientific mind? Not necessarily!
Maybe scientific nonsense became so perfect that we don’t notice the idiocies which are embedded in this knowledge.

———————-
2. Big Crunch.
———————-

(5/14)
But that’s how we created our universe: full of
simplifications, understatements and obsessions like Big Crunch which completely captured the scientific minds.

Only, if this truth about gravitation as we know it was the whole truth about the universe, then nothing would make sense.
And yet repulsive grawity still appears in very serious scientific considerations (about inflation and even expansion of the universe).

(6/14)
Only, from this incredible power of repulsive gravity that can push the cluster of billions of galaxies together with the energy of their gravity.
Only what causes these terrible doubts of repulsive gravity … in which direction to push the galaxies – towards us or in the opposite direction.
Because the funniest thing that could happen would be if this terrible force of repulsive gravity clutched our supercluster of galaxies in a murderous grip.

———–
Note: these considerations temporarily do not concern the problem of God, because it is more complicated, not only than it seems to atheists but also Catholics.

Have you a question? Or maybe you think I’m hopelessly off base? So I’d love to find out what I might be missing.

My English is very weak, even hopeless.
Only one can wonder if an Englishman really needs english when doesn’t have the curiosity to understand the Universe.
Where is the enthusiasm to show and prove that I’m just a stupid Pole who actually understands nothing.
————————————–

2/12

clarification (part 2 of 12)

The laziness and helplessness of the white man’s mind scares. So despite my difficulties with the English, I wrote additional clarifications. Maybe in the end someone will understand in what problem and will help to specify my text.

Big Bang is a joking name of the processes in which the universe was created.
Probably very violent, explosive, energetic.
A big explosion that created space, initial expansion and our universe.
And what is the most strange, all this seems logical and this is confirmed by our observation.

The only problem is that the universe, by its very nature, as something independent of any extrinsic factors (e.g. such as space) could not come into existence in the great explosion. Even a grenade explosion.
For there is no such thing as the two states of space: the existing (old) space and the emerging, new space as the result of the birth of our universe.

One can of course say that the universe was created in a great explosion (but) controlled by gravity which prevented the rupture of the universe. But still without any sense.

_____________________________________
This is just an additional explanation to the part of the text below which is very complicated.
(2/12)
So what if we were able to understand the cause for the formation of the universe as a result of Big Bang?
Only, what about the reason behind the very existence of the Universe in the first place?
Because the Big Bang cannot be a scientific explanation of how the universe itself was created.
———————————————————-

Please pay attention to this contradiction.
Because this is the whole essence of the problem.
1. the whole scientific description of universe which is in thousands of articles and scientific books, describes the development of the universe that was created and formed as a result of a great explosion.
So I wrote: (what if we were able to understand the cause for the formation of the universe as a result of Big Bang?)
2. Only the problem is that the universe itself, as something independent of anything, could not arise in a great explosion.
So I wrote: (Only, what about the reason behind the very existence of the Universe in the first place?)

w2

2. two fairy tales

The existence of higher powers and perhaps no less unrealistic scientific description of the origin of the universe – full of inaccuracies, scientific nonchalance and indolence.

a lazy scientist can treat the Bible as proof of the existence of God. but then it is not surprising that, at the same time, such a scientist cannot ask wise questions only ridicules the problem with questions of the type … Where was God before the creation of the Universe?

Can it be surprising that also in science we can not ask such wise questions. Rather in their place, strange answers appear, substitutes of scientific truth, to which only the Nobel prize awaits, to set the direction of seeking the truth.

There is no any evidence for the existence of god – just as, contrary to appearances, there is no really true and sensible evidence that this universe was created from nothing, spontaneously, independent of anything.

We only have evidence of the existence of the universe.
Scientific description only confirming our reality – imprecise, superficial, problematic.
and in addition we have a beautiful fairy tale that the universe was born from some enchanted poppy seed.

w1

The existence of higher powers or rather no less unrealistic scientific description of the origin of the universe.
But two tales are a bit of an exaggeration.
So faith or just nonchalance and indolence.

Because if the bible is treated as proof of the existence of God … and (scientists) not being able to ask reasonable questions, only ridicule the problem with questions of the type – where was a god when there was no universe created by him.

Can it be surprising that also in science we can not ask the wise questions.
In return, strange answers appear – substitutes of scientific truth, to which only the Nobel prize awaits, to set the direction of seeking the truth.

There is no any evidence for the existence of god – just as, contrary to appearances, there is no really true and sensible evidence that this universe was created from nothing, spontaneously, independent of anything.

We only have evidence of the existence of the universe. Scientific description only confirming our reality – imprecise, superficial, problematic.
and in addition we have a beautiful fairy tale that the universe was enchanted in the poppy seed.

without 2017

1. big bang; fake coin!

Almost our entirely comprehending of the nature of this Universe manifested itself for us in a few glimpses of human genius: finite but without borders… independent of anything… expands from Nothing…ness! But if that’s all true, in all of this is hidden the greatest mystery of All, but doesn’t apply to God or our existence! So doesn’t even let us try to guess what it might be.

Our understanding of the universe is mostly based on Einstein’s thoughts. Maybe even partly wrong – but great.

However, his genius doesn’t give us wisdom, it is only used to justify increasingly preposterous theories… so probably that is the reason that our reasoning about the nature of the Universe turned out to be a blind alley!

Mediocrity of scientific comprehending manifest itself in very clever deliberations about the universe when smart scientists perceive the universe according to current intellectual needs – like two sides of the gold coin. Only that it is a coin of double value, depending on what falls, eagle or tails.

And the very nasty effect schizophrenia of the scientific mind is the fact that maybe we know that the name Big Bang is a joke but we often forget about this and then moronic theories appear.

Simplifying: The universe absolutely cannot be the result of a great explosion (Big Bang)!

So NO Big Crunch (an obsession that has completely taken over the scientific mind).

Looking into the depths of the sky we “can see” infinity. But it’s just an illusion.

So we got rid of God. Just a pity WE cannot get rid of the illusion that our mind is a gift from heavens.

So how to understand this universe when we don’t have the slightest idea of what we want to understand.

And that isn’t a question of faith, only of reason.

2. expansion

It is obvious that galaxies aren’t actually moving through space (pushes by repulsive gravity) like USS Enterprise on its journey to the edges of the Universe … only the space itself expands … and carries the galaxies (also carries the whole sense of our wisdom)!

But turned out it was a big mistake to forget about the innate wisdom of beautiful minds.

Because in the end they figured out that is a complete nonsense to claim that the space carries the galaxies.

So it seems the only reasonable guess may be that the galaxies are actually stationary, while the space itself expands (in itself) between motionless galaxies … by growth in its size increases the distance between (clusters of) galaxies and this is what causes the expansion of the universe.

Only the problem is that galaxies must remain on their stationary positions not only in relation to space, but also remain in fixed position with respect to the whole expanding universe.

That is, evenly distributed throughout the universe … at least as we see it actually!

Though these are not identical processes!

Because in order to remain on their fixed positions (to keep up with the expanding Universe), galaxies must rush like crazy. Of course, this doesn’t apply to the mechanism of these processes, only how we perceive it.

Craziness! NO! Because a human mind appeared, creating the most complicated relation (illusions) in this Universe. For example, when we see rushing galaxies (away from us), even 12 c, which in reality they are stuck in total immobility (a little simplification).

Because (to paraphrase the funny statements of quantum physics), one can only say that most of our observations have a negligible effect on our understanding of the essence of this universe.

Isn’t strange – ALL in universe is imaginable … in the total helplessness, we can count on mathematics, which is able to explain and prove almost everything.

Just not this one – when the space itself expands, growing between (but doesn’t affect) fixed galaxies, and galaxies distant from each other without any real causes, remaining in complete immobility!

So … when in the early universe two galaxy were separated from each other at a distance of 1 billion light years, so now, after 12 billion years, these same two galaxies are separated (from each other) by a distance of about 86 billion light years … aren’t flying apart from each other.

Because, if the universe is really expanding, there isn’t other possibility, even if it is incomprehensible … and we even aren’t able to imagine to what extent of these mechanisms are unimaginable

3-4 dark, inflation.

In the early days of the Universe “dark energy was a trivial constituent of the cosmos”.

Another idiot of the great Nobel winner (Riess).

Trivial … but dark energy (if exists) created the Universe from very beginning: the entire stuff! And it isn’t nothing extraordinary because the quantum fluctuation also has the same possibilities – creates the Universe.

And both these “fabulous” possibilities manifest itself through the action of the same mechanism!

Only when in thousands of scientific papers presented is this wonderful picture of the universe which was created (out of nothing) from indefinite theoretical gadget the size of a proton … maybe someone forget to specify, that quantum fluctuation isn’t the divine property … just a simple mechanism of the real universe with very limited possibilities.

But the moment comes that even dark energy begins to upset beautiful minds which cannot comprehend nothing from its nature; scientists are beginning to return to the naive notion that the repulsive gravity causes the expansion of the universe (especially in a period of inflation).

So let’s consider this freak of scientific genius.

What about the possibility that there is moment of time when the fundamental properties that are the basis of the existence of the universe … disappear. And it isn’t joke only a very serious scientific theory!

The gravity that created the universe from the nothingness of space and time – simply disappears. and appears the repulsive gravity which is supposed to create an explosive expansion of the universe (as grenade) – which tearing the universe from the size of a grenade … ripples the universe to the size of the sun … in its full volume and mass.

And when it seemed that the universe already gone forever … devoid of gravity which is the essence of its existence … at the last moment this destructive gravity changed itself again into the normal gravity …

So imagine that the bored computer (or mad scientist), switches the power parameters in the magnetic trap with antimatter from the minus phase to plus. Then, frightened, after a fraction of a millisecond, it switches the power back to normal … and as in a scientific fairy tale, everything was back to normal.

However, inflation develops pretty well, creating not only our universe, but billions of new universes.

So what caused that inflation work? Nothing. just inflation is the biggest scientific nonsense of the 20th century.

But why, despite total idiocy, scientists so fiercely fighting for the duration of this illusion.

Because if inflation were not invented, the possibility of explaining how our universe was created (out of nothing), was dramatically reduced.

And when it might seem that this is the end of a fairy tale, it suddenly turned out that inflation isn’t only necessary to create multiverse.

But it is still necessary to have primary inflation which must have created a primordial grenade in order to have a great explosion (Big Bang).

So the idea goes like this: 1… the original inflation that doesn’t create matter … 2 … big explosion (Big Bang) … 3 … the normal inflation that creates the proper universe with its space and stuff.

5. The scientific schizophrenia!

There are only two possibilities: the infinite and finite universe (boundless). But (famous) Schmidt carefree states: it isn’t a finite universe, it isn’t an infinite universe – it is sort of on the border. So that is our knowledge.

The discovery that the expansion of the universe accelerates, not only saved its existence, but also undoubtedly obscured one of the stupidest bits of scientific genius – that under the influence of gravity, the universe collapses into itself.

Only gravity isn’t the force that has a direct influence on the expansion of the universe – so cannot stop expansion and destroy the universe.

Simplifying. If gravity forces, such as repulsive gravity, cause the expansion of the universe (total idiocy, but still constantly appearing in very wise scientific considerations), then gravity could pull the universe to non-existence.

However, even though gravity doesn’t determine the expansion of the universe, it is undoubtedly gravity creates the universe.

But If this absolute truth about gravity was the whole truth about the mechanisms of the universe, then nothing would make sense.

Because the basic property of gravity is that gravity is always attractive, pulling things together. So where would be the sense of the universe if its basic property (gravity) made everything immediately fall into non-existence.

It seems that this problem could be solved by the great explosion that begins the existence of the universe. Only the Universe as we know (finite; boundless), cannot be the result of a great explosion (even grenade explosion).

But it doesn’t satisfy the scientists.

Because the universe that was created in the great explosion may justify many scientific absurdities … of course, beyond the very sense of its own existence.

But while considering the universe that came into existence according to real scientific assumptions: as an independent entity, finite but without borders … then there is no way to get rid of the various fairy tales of the disappearing or bursting universe.

Probably the beginning of the universe was very violent and explosive, but it wasn’t a grenade explosion in a basket full of apples in Mr. Newton’s garden.

And when it seemed impossible to come up with anything more idiotic (like the big crunch), scientists jumped out with even more absurd assumption – so Big RIP.

But do not open the gates of heavens.The universe can grow because it expands on its own – into itself … by increasing the space in its volume, which causes the expansion of the whole universe.

But the universe cannot break in itself. Because it would deny the very essence of the universe. The more it cannot rupture out. So no Big RIP! Because if it were possible – it wouldn’t be possible for the existence of the universe.

Only when Riess argues that we can come to 99% dark energy … so no limit of scientific stupidity? Can someone wise tell when was 2% or 32%. When? With such “great” scientific statement, nothing is certain.

So where’s the truth?

This beautiful and unique theory about the creation of the universe as being independent of space and time, the only theory that could really create the universe as it exists now.

While practical observations from this reality indicate that the beginning of the universe was an explosion so incredible that it is difficult to ignore the evidence of the existence of such processes at the beginning of the universe.

And between this all lies the human mind, which actually doesn’t understand anything from it all.

6. Quantum Reality

Since it isn’t already possible to work out nothing sensible what is actually happening with the Universe, so scientists rushed to the quirks of quantum physics there to seek wisdom. Maybe we can find a real insight into the nature of the universe in its quantum properties. But don’t look for the miraculous powers that supposedly created the universe, but rather look for causes and consequences of frailty of our minds.

It may seem that only in the quantum reality can fully reveal the limitless possibilities of our genius. Just a pity is that quantum processes unaware of their unlimited possibilities, act in accordance with their natural properties: run very smoothly and efficiently, only in themselves known and the right way, that is, according to the nature of this universe, as indeed is confirmed in practice our reality. Even ignoring the fact that “ignoring” the rights and principles laid down by science could have caused that this beautiful universe would never have made.

7. back to the beginning

As modern scientists say a classic examination of the Universe has no sense … because everything what is interesting and important in the universe takes place at deeper levels, where the (ordinary) mind doesn’t have access. Perhaps even the reason Einstein would be insufficient? We know what’s going on: dimensions, strings, advanced quantum physics and other wonders …

(!) so human mind appeared, creating the most complicated relation in this Universe – only without any practical significance, even if we could turn our Sun into a black hole! So can first, without scientific fever pitch, maybe we try to explain the most unimaginable mechanism in the history of the universe: as the universe expands, absolutely no worries about galaxies … as scientists absolutely no worries about primary mechanisms of these processes, pretty pleased have the Doppler effect.

So what mechanisms works when the nearest cluster of galaxies moving away from us?

Enough to explain a small detail – that’s all!

sHumel.wielun.poland