without …

without any sense by ignorant

If there are mechanisms which creates the space of the (expanding) universe, this does not mean that quantum mechanics could have created the Universe, as … “physicists argue that the universe itself is the result of such a quantum fluctuation”.
Because the existence of these mechanisms (in nothingness) means that in fact, it is simply the space … space before the Big Bang!
So not finite universe without borders.

How stupid scientists must be if they think that Something appeared out of nowhere and from nothing, spontaneously, as the Big Bang.
Energy from nothing, and next matter, stars.
And over a period of 5 billion years, several trillion of galaxies appeared.
And this is all that the universe may create, and next it is just expanding faster and faster until it disappears (big rip).

It is not enough to read the Bible or create revealed theories … enough to think.
Because at this moment nothing make sense, as scientists have not yet managed to figure out how galaxies can form in the expanding space and even collide between themselves.
Senseless questions, so why I ask. Because it is a question about the sense of the universe.

But it seems that brilliant minds in their naive wisdom are not even aware that the image of their ignorance is right before their eyes, as the pretty stupid analogy with baking bread.
How make they think? Maybe my analogy help: we bake a raisin bread that weighs 2 pounds, and when baked, it is many times bigger, weighs 20 pounds, and 20 times more raisins.

“The analogy doesn’t give you the real stuff about the expansion of the universe” sc.
That’s true, but at the same time, it is the perfect example of scientific stupidity.
Of course, this analogy may be (even) imperfect for various reasons, but cannot falsify the truth, even revealed truth!

part 1

Nothing is certain in cosmology, but if we observe a gravitationally bound cluster of stars, e.g. Andromeda, so undoubtedly also must be a gravitationally bound clusters of galaxies.
But 99.99% of scientists say galaxies are moving away, and this denies the existence of clusters of galaxies.
So scientists must explain how and where several trillion galaxies appeared? Probably not in the expanding space of the universe, because that’s where galaxies collide (joke).

But from the very beginning, it made no sense at all. A theory describing the universe based on the observation of 24 or 46 galaxies.
In the 1920s, Edwin Hubble had the right not to know that galaxies are not free objects without any constraints, but are grouped into clusters of galaxies, and so on.
Scientific observations of galaxies (redshift) in a gravitationally bound cluster of galaxies, have no scientific sense at all.
It is not known what redshift implies, but it certainly does not mean that dark energy working in the cluster of galaxies.

The greatest paradox of this supposedly scientific evidence is that cannot have a scientific basis.
“Hubble first plotted the trend using 46 galaxies”.
And scientists so proud of their wisdom that observing of 46 galaxies allowed to understand the essence of the entire universe.
How can scientists so cruelly mock one’s own stupidity.
“Today, 85 years later, the Hubble Law is a given, measured with high precision to vastly larger cosmic scales than Hubble’s first glimpse into our immediate cosmic neighborhood”.

part 2

The infinite eternal universe … and next was finite expanding universe, a stupid scientific creation something from nothing, effect of ignorance and misunderstanding.

Of course, it can be said (with a large dose of idiocy) that the universe (as the Big Bang), was created from nothing, but this is only the beginning of the problems.

“During inflation, as the universe gets bigger and bigger and more and more matter is created” guth.
So it was inflation … but how when the speed of (repulsive) gravity cannot exceed the speed of light and the space that creates matter is no longer empty space (the limits to the speed of light begin to work).

If inflation failed “produce” something that could form trillions of trillions galaxies, then we have a problem. But that’s just a rather scientific thoughtlessness.
Maybe it is a just a joke from scientific stupidity.
Because even if the Big Bang could create something out of nothing or inflation produced something that could create trillions of galaxies, it doesn’t make any sense.
Because such stuff can be only created by expanding space, of course if such a universe were to make any sense at all.

But at this moment nothing make sense, because scientists have not yet managed to figure out how galaxies form in the expanding space, but not in clusters of galaxies.
It is not enough to have a brilliant theory that for the first 5 billion years, gravity dominated, and this enabled the formation of 3 trillion galaxies.
And next dark energy began to dominate and no more galaxies. Only there is a small problem.

This universe is not something temporary.
If arise, cannot disappear or fall apart; such a universe must be eternal.
Because energy (spacetime) cannot be lost, it cannot rip, and it is absolutely necessary for the trillions of trillions of galaxies to appear.
So the rapidly expanding universe means not only more space containing energy, and proportionally more matter, more galaxies.
Because space produces matter, and every process depends on all others, so there won’t be more space without galaxies – without trillions of trillions of galaxies, there is no expanding universe.

But scientists don’t understand any of this.
So maybe they know how to add a pound of raisins to a just baking raisin bread?
Or maybe brilliant minds, in their naive wisdom, are aware of how to add trillion of trillions of galaxies to the expanding universe.
Maybe a similar analogy: You bake a raisin bread that weighs 2 pounds, and when baked, it weighs 20 pounds, also 20 times larger, and 20 times more raisins.
Perhaps the stupidest analogy that contradicts the wisest scientific truth: “Universe is getting less dense as it expands”.

But the time is coming, when a new Webb telescope may change everything, even stop the expanding universe, the greatest scientific blunder ever.
When everything that made sense was thoughtlessly rejected and evident nonsense was accepted with blind faith, without worrying too much it doesn’t make any sense.
So maybe Webb take us to a new, more sensible universe.
Maybe we are in for a very (un)pleasant surprise.
If Webb telescope is as good as is described, it may shift the age of the universe a lot in time.
Soon it will be not 13.8 but 17,2 billion years.

So maybe it would be more sensible to reject revealed truth and return to reality.
Because in fact, the creation of new stars or the formation of galaxies, such processes can only take place in (our) eternal universe; in cluster of galaxies, where only idiots can see the expanding space between galaxies.

……………………

Allegedly artificial intelligence far exceeds the capabilities of the human mind.
So why couldn’t catch all the nonsense and inaccuracies in human reasoning?
Enough to read the full of wisdom essays great professors from renowned universities about cosmos devoid of any deeper sense.
So in case it turned out that a stupid little man (IQ 73) who for 20 years did not manage to master English … so in case it turns out that the really expanding universe is only a scientific illusion, then the question arises what is the value of this ai? A human thing to err, but rather not to risk entrusting the fate of humanity to ai.

Let’s look at the drawing of the expanding universe. At the beginning of the drawing is 5 symbolic galaxies are drawn. In the further part of the picture, the tube expands and at the end of the tube 5 galaxies are drawn again, while at least thousands of symbolic galaxies should be drawn.
This is the whole essence of the problem.
Actually, the drawing depicts the space of the expanding universe, and that could only be half the truth.
While there could have been 5 million galaxies in the early universe, now there may be 5 trillion.
and must be trillion of trillions galaxies.
Possibly created from nothing, possibly created in dark energy, but this is only the beginning of the greatest mystery.

……………………
Nothing is wrong with the Big Bang Theory, except that ignorant people don’t understand it and reject it because they don’t understand it or basic math or basic physics or the scientific method. nyt

Share this: